May 23, 2008 - $24 Million Settlement Reached in Contaminated Pet Food Suit
Canadian-based Menu Foods and other pet food manufacturers and retailers implicated in the largest pet food recall in history last year have agreed to establish a $24 million fund to compensate aggrieved pet owners, according to a tentative settlement filed Thursday in U.S. District Court. The agreement is still awaiting court approval.
The pet food products contained a tainted ingredient from that caused illness and death to thousands of dogs and cats. The settlement, which has been in negotiation for 7 months, would resolve over 100 lawsuits brought in the and a dozen more in .
The fund, if approved, would distribute cash funds to plaintiffs over a period of several months. Most of the money will be disbursed to pet owners whose pets became ill or died as a result of consuming the contaminated pet food.
Expenses that would be compensated for under the agreement include veterinary bills, pet food costs, burial costs, replacement pet costs, property damage and lost wages to care for sick animals that ate the recalled pet food on or after March 16, 2007.
Two ingredients in the tainted pet food—wheat gluten and rice protein concentrate—were contaminated in with the industrial chemical melamine, which enhanced the protein-rich appearance of the ingredients.
The FDA did not announce how many pets were affected by the tainted pet food, but did disclose that it received more than 17,000 complaints from pet owners.
The recall involved 180 different brands of pet food and pet treats.
The agreement will also require that pet food makers conduct testing of product ingredients for the presence of melamine.
<< back
The Law Office of Richard C. Senker handles the following types of cases: Personal Injury including Automobile Accidents, Spinal Cord Injuries, Traumatic Brain Injuries, Wrongful Death, Insurance Bad Faith, Nursing Home Abuse, Workers' Compensation, Airplane Accidents, Dog Bites, Drunk Driving Injuries, Large Truck Accidents, Motorcycle Accidents, School Bus Accidents, Slip and Fall Accidents.
The Law Office of Richard C. Senker serves the following areas: Abington, Allentown, Ambler, Ardmore, Audubon, Bensalem, Berks County, Berwyn, Bethlehem, Blue Bell, Boyertown, Brandywine, Bridgeport, Bristol, Broad Axe, Broomall, Bryn Athyn, Bryn Mawr, Bucks County, Cheltenham, Chesterbrook, Chester County, Chester Springs, Chestnut Hill, Churchville, Coatesville, Collegeville, Conshohocken, Darby, Delaware County, Devon, Douglasville, Doylestown, Dresher, Drexel Hill, Eagleville, East Greenville, East Norriton, Elkins Park, Erdenheim, Exton, Feasterville, Flourtown, Fort Washington, Frazer, Gilbertsville, Gladwynne, Glenside, Green Lane, Harleysville, Hatboro, Hatfield, Haverford, Havertown, Horsham, Huntingdon Valley, Jenkintown, King of Prussia, Lafayette Hill, Langhorne, Lansdale, Lansdowne, Lehigh County, Lehigh Valley, Levittown, Limerick, Lionville, Lower Gwynedd, Lower Merion, Lower Pottsgrove, Lower Providence, The Main Line, Malvern, Media, Methacton, Montgomery County, Montgomeryville, Norristown, North Wales, Oaks, Olney, Oreland, Paoli, Perkasie, Philadelphia, Phoenixville, Plymouth Meeting, Pottstown, Quakertown, Radnor, Red Hill, Rockledge, Rosemont, Royersford, Schwenksville, Sellersville, Skippack, Southampton, Souderton, Springfield, Springhouse, St. Davids, Telford, Trevose, Trappe, Trooper, Upper Darby, Upper Dublin, Upper Gwynedd, Upper Merion, Upper Pottsgrove, Upper Providence, Valley Forge, Villanova, Warminster, Warrington, Wayne, West Chester, West Norriton, Willow Grove, Worcester, Wyndmoor, Wynnewood.
The legal information offered by The Law Office of Richard C. Senker and contained herein regarding Pennsylvania legal statutes and Pennsylvania claimants' rights, is general in scope. No legal attorney / client relationship with our attorneys is hereby formed nor is the information herein intended as formal legal advice. Please contact a Pennsylvania lawyer regarding your specific inquiry.See Terms of Use. |
