April 21, 2008 - Health Insurers Ordered to Reinstate Revoked Policies
April 18, 2008 - Three of the leading health insurance companies in California have been ordered to reinstate 26 policies that were revoked because insurers claimed that policyholders lied on their applications. California regulators said the policies were wrongly rescinded for inadvertent errors made on the applications.
A California regulatory agency warned the companies that it will also review thousands of revocations of insurance policies from the past four years, which may lead to many more reinstatements.
Consumer advocates believe that the policy of wrongful rescission by insurance companies is not limited to these 26 cases in California. They say that predatory insurance practices are an industry-wide problem.
These problems occur more often with individual health insurance plans than with group plans. Only about 5% of insurance policies are currently purchased on the individual market. However, a plan proposed by Republican presidential nominee, Senator John McCain, would cause a dramatic spike in individual insurance plans.
McCain proposes converting the tax break that employees currently receive on health insurance benefits into a tax credit to be used to purchase health insurance on the individual insurance market. This would place more individuals at risk of having their policies revoked for inadvertent mistakes on insurance applications.
If what is happening in California is indicative of a more widespread problem in the insurance industry, reform measures will be necessary to prevent predatory insurance practices.
<< back
The Law Office of Richard C. Senker handles the following types of cases: Personal Injury including Automobile Accidents, Spinal Cord Injuries, Traumatic Brain Injuries, Wrongful Death, Insurance Bad Faith, Nursing Home Abuse, Workers' Compensation, Airplane Accidents, Dog Bites, Drunk Driving Injuries, Large Truck Accidents, Motorcycle Accidents, School Bus Accidents, Slip and Fall Accidents.
The Law Office of Richard C. Senker serves the following areas: Abington, Allentown, Ambler, Ardmore, Audubon, Bensalem, Berks County, Berwyn, Bethlehem, Blue Bell, Boyertown, Brandywine, Bridgeport, Bristol, Broad Axe, Broomall, Bryn Athyn, Bryn Mawr, Bucks County, Cheltenham, Chesterbrook, Chester County, Chester Springs, Chestnut Hill, Churchville, Coatesville, Collegeville, Conshohocken, Darby, Delaware County, Devon, Douglasville, Doylestown, Dresher, Drexel Hill, Eagleville, East Greenville, East Norriton, Elkins Park, Erdenheim, Exton, Feasterville, Flourtown, Fort Washington, Frazer, Gilbertsville, Gladwynne, Glenside, Green Lane, Harleysville, Hatboro, Hatfield, Haverford, Havertown, Horsham, Huntingdon Valley, Jenkintown, King of Prussia, Lafayette Hill, Langhorne, Lansdale, Lansdowne, Lehigh County, Lehigh Valley, Levittown, Limerick, Lionville, Lower Gwynedd, Lower Merion, Lower Pottsgrove, Lower Providence, The Main Line, Malvern, Media, Methacton, Montgomery County, Montgomeryville, Norristown, North Wales, Oaks, Olney, Oreland, Paoli, Perkasie, Philadelphia, Phoenixville, Plymouth Meeting, Pottstown, Quakertown, Radnor, Red Hill, Rockledge, Rosemont, Royersford, Schwenksville, Sellersville, Skippack, Southampton, Souderton, Springfield, Springhouse, St. Davids, Telford, Trevose, Trappe, Trooper, Upper Darby, Upper Dublin, Upper Gwynedd, Upper Merion, Upper Pottsgrove, Upper Providence, Valley Forge, Villanova, Warminster, Warrington, Wayne, West Chester, West Norriton, Willow Grove, Worcester, Wyndmoor, Wynnewood.
The legal information offered by The Law Office of Richard C. Senker and contained herein regarding Pennsylvania legal statutes and Pennsylvania claimants' rights, is general in scope. No legal attorney / client relationship with our attorneys is hereby formed nor is the information herein intended as formal legal advice. Please contact a Pennsylvania lawyer regarding your specific inquiry.See Terms of Use. |
